Carlson misses point of Green Movement

John Carlson raises good points that the Green movement has not come of age in his recent column in the May 31 Redmond Reporter. But the point of the Green movement is that Western culture has not come of age. We have not used our technological advances to live in harmony and limit our damage to the planet and each other. The Green movement is at least looking to make our lifestyle sustainable.

LETTERS

John Carlson raises good points that the Green movement has not come of age in his recent column in the May 31 Redmond Reporter.

But the point of the Green movement is that Western culture has not come of age. We have not used our technological advances to live in harmony and limit our damage to the planet and each other. The Green movement is at least looking to make our lifestyle sustainable.

Carlson is just looking the other way.

I realized the Green movement was out of whack when my box lunch by “Organic-to-Go” at an environmental conference included an apple — pre-sliced and sealed in plastic. Why improve on packaging God has already made perfect?

But many of Carlson’s suggestions make just as little sense. Cut down old-growth forests to plant younger trees? The idea only makes sense in a vacuum. Old-growth forests serve many purposes that young ones don’t, including providing habitat for many species, preventing soil erosion, and protecting shade-growing fauna that do absorb carbon.

Going green is not about tackling problems like climate change in isolation, but about realizing how everything is connected together.

Likewise, the argument for keeping growth hormones and pesticides in the foods we grow only makes sense if you feel comfortable recommending steroids and poison as part of your child’s complete, balanced breakfast.

True, the Manhattan way of life is the greenest we have in America. But the values of consumption and materialism promoted by marketers and media companies based there are not.

They lead to multi-car garages and water-drunk lawns that leave less room for the rest of life on this planet. They also turn “Green” into a fad, feeding the cycle of newer and better, when true green should be about finding satisfaction with what we already have (including Geo Metros).

In running this beautiful planet, God gives us everything we need in order to eat, move, play, get around, and be happy.

The problem both with some of Carlson’s ideas, and of the “Green” bandwagon he criticizes, is the idea that we can do better.

Andrew Varyu

Redmond

More in Letters to the Editor

Homelessness and the right to survive | Letter

Do homeless persons have a constitutional and civil right to occupy and… Continue reading

Ban FGM | Letter

Our state legislature just failed to ban the barbaric procedure known as… Continue reading

Equal-opportunity benefits needed | Letter

SB 5331 in the state legislature is called “long-term care services and… Continue reading

No urbanizing Samammish River Valley | Letter

DEMAND an environmental impact statement (EIS) for KCC ordinance 2018-0241 In the… Continue reading

Letters on LWSD levy | Letter

Whenever I’m asked for money, I have a few questions for the… Continue reading

Letters on EvergreenHealth levy | Letter

We’re writing to endorse EvergreenHealth’s proposed measure to increase levy funding that… Continue reading

All people welcome at Redmond United Methodist Church | Letter

All people welcome at RUMC On Feb. 26, the legislative body of… Continue reading

A closer look at Emerald Heights expansion | Letter

In his Feb. 8 letter to the editor, a 13-year-old kid writes… Continue reading

On the Emerald Heights expansion | Letter

On the Emerald Heights expansion My name is Ethan Johnson. I am… Continue reading

Most Read