Emerald Heights concerns | Letter

Emerald Heights concerns

The Emerald Heights concerns recently addressed in the Redmond Reporter are more widespread than just the neighborhood that it exists in. Like many of the neighborhoods on Education Hill, we are a residential neighborhood — R4 is our zoning. One of the most important codes for any residential neighborhood on the hill, as well as any other residential area, is the requirement that the atmosphere, aesthetics and general feel of the area be maintained.

The original approval for Emerald Heights in 1988 required that buildings be placed on the central area of the property to maintain a buffer of natural area between these uncharacteristic buildings from our single-family homes. When a project of this size is being considered, there are legal requirements on notifying residents. Part of that process includes forms, filled out by residents that include codes and regulations that are being violated. The city has dozens and dozens of legally rendered comments showing clearly that this proposal is in violation of city code.

Any of you who live in single-family neighborhoods, how would you like to have a nearly two-block-long building erected in your neighborhood, 30 feet tall, with a flat roof so it can be 30 feet of living space? It looks very much like an office building. It has stairway towers that will be lit at night. Outdoor lighting that will be on. Living facilities that will face the road with lighting as well. The boulevard feel of Abbey Road will be lost to this huge building looming over you as you walk or drive by.

If this project is approved, a dangerous precedent will be set. That would be the flagrant disregard of city building codes set to maintain our residential neighborhoods.

Redmond neighborhoods would be up for grabs! If the building code is changed, to remove the requirement that the aesthetics and atmosphere of our neighborhoods be preserved, buyer beware! I do not dislike older people, I am an older people! The claim that the need for this type of housing for older people is huge, is real. The thought that Emerald Heights can get anywhere close to meeting that need is simply a ploy. It is a business plan gone bad. I could offer additional facts, photos and information on this, but will let this sit on all who care about where they live.

Wendy Engquist

Redmond

More in Letters to the Editor

A frightening reality | Letter

One can only conclude that President Donald Trump’s reality is his and… Continue reading

Big Oil’s ‘Kool-Aid’ | Letter

Voters drank Big Oil’s “Kool-Aid” on Nov. 6 and rejected Initiative 1631.… Continue reading

The next generation | Letter

Did you know that 50 percent of all lifetime causes of mental… Continue reading

Cost of I-1631 will be passed on to consumers | Letter

This is in response to the guest column on Oct. 12 by… Continue reading

Give the gift of a future | Letter

Give your friends and family the best gift you could give them:… Continue reading

Kavanaugh should be rejected / Letters

I find Republican caviling at the Brett Kavanaugh hearings baffling. For just… Continue reading

Trump should stand up for public lands / Letter

When Donald Trump was elected president, sportsmen had high hopes that the… Continue reading

Offer your input at city council budget hearing on Oct. 16 / Letters

With all the local government spending to end homelessness, why is there… Continue reading

Funding sources for Downtown Park | Letter

n the environment that we are living in, all too often truth… Continue reading

Sammamish River Trail deserves attention | Letter

I have to add my agreement to the letter last month from… Continue reading

Prison reform needed | Letter

I want freedom for criminalized people of color in private prisons. Washington… Continue reading

Why was Downtown Park so costly? | Letter

The opening of the Downtown Park this past weekend adds a new… Continue reading