Equal-opportunity benefits needed | Letter

SB 5331 in the state legislature is called “long-term care services and supports.” The proposed program is actually a catastrophic care benefit.

This bill would create a long-term care trust. W-2 workers would pay a premium of 0.58 percent of their payroll to this trust. Small business owners could opt in. Eligible individuals would have a one-time lifetime benefit of $36,500, adjusted for inflation. This is intended to occur before Medicaid spend-down. The percentage for the premiums is fixed and therefore it is not progressive taxation, where the percentage is progressively higher with income.

We must not forget two guiding principles: universal health care, as opposed to cherry picking healthy patients, and opposition to work requirements as a condition of health care benefits.

The following persons would be excluded from enrollment: persons on disability, stay-at-home spouses and parents, current retirees, long-term unemployed, full-time students, and freelancers, musicians and artists who might not meet the hours requirements.

Section two lists those eligible to receive benefits: “age [18] or older, residing in the state of Washington, was not disabled before the age of [18], has been determined to meet the minimum level of assistance with activities of daily living necessary to receive benefits through the trust program, as established in this chapter, and who has not exhausted the lifetime limit of benefit units.”

The problematic language is “was not disabled before the age of [18].” What does this mean? Does this mean that a student with disabilities would have to pay the taxes while employed after graduation, but would be ineligible to receive benefits?

These exclusions from enrollment and benefits constitute cherry picking of subscribers.

By limiting enrollment to W-2 workers and business owners, with minimum hours requirements, the bill establishes a de facto work requirement for benefits. Rather than having the determination made when people apply for benefits, the work requirement is put at the beginning of the process, blocking enrollment. Imposing work requirements is not consistent with the idea of universal health care and health care as a human right.

At one of the bill hearings, Sen. Mark Mullet said that if people pay into the system for years and then retire to another state, they will lose the benefits that they paid for.

I hope that the legislature will correct these problems and give everyone equal opportunity for this benefit.

Linda Seltzer

Redmond

More in Letters to the Editor

Birney: Ready day one | Letter

Birney: Ready day one I support Angela Birney for our next mayor… Continue reading

Use your voice | Letter

Excellent reporting on the Margins program from Mercer Island High School (Reporter,… Continue reading

Meeting goals without a levy | Letter

At several meetings this month city staff has been saying they need… Continue reading

A parent’s perspective | Letter

Graduation…the moment every parent looks forward to with pride and also with… Continue reading

Alternative to Sammamish River Trail | Letter

The proposed King County improvements to the Sammamish River Trail should be… Continue reading

An eye opener | Letter

I was quite taken by the article “Susan’s quest for justice, the… Continue reading

Start impeachment hearings | Letter

As a constituent of Rep. Suzan DelBene, I strongly support starting impeachment… Continue reading

Thank you Hiruko | Letter

Ashley Hiruko’s detailed story (“Susan’s quest for justice and the civil legal… Continue reading

Khan for Council | Letter

I am proud to support my friend Varisha Khan in her candidacy… Continue reading

Thank you Inslee | Letter

Thank you Inslee I am proud to have my Gov. Jay Inslee,… Continue reading

Keep Redmond a great hometown | Letter

Each of us has chosen Redmond as our hometown. Many, like our… Continue reading

You need to run for office | Letter

In 2016, we all learned an interesting lesson, literally anyone who wants… Continue reading