Fear of farmed salmon | Letter

As a certified fish pathologist, I’m continually surprised at the way news reports on Atlantic salmon and their focus on the biased fears of the “Wild Fish Conservancy.” Editors then bury important facts deep in the articles.

Fact 1: Atlantic salmon have never successfully established themselves in any Washington river system even after millions of eggs and fish were intentionally introduced numerous times from 1904 to 1991.

Fact 2: Atlantic salmon are considered a superior trophy fish to people living near their home waters of the North Atlantic. Additionally, fishermen here are thrilled for the opportunity to fish for and catch escaped fish. The idea that they could somehow take over the Pacific Northwest is without foundation because this species could be easily removed from our rivers with a simple and very popular “overfishing” program.

Fact 3: Salmon farms provide desperately needed jobs in rural communities and support families working for multiple businesses that supply equipment, expertise and healthy food for these fish.

Fact 4: Just like all other farmed animals (such as chickens, pigs and cattle), salmon are vaccinated when they are young and then carefully monitored to ensure this a healthy food choice.

People like to say “Fish farms could hurt our wild salmon and farmed salmon are not safe to eat.” This naïve view ignores several key facts. First of all, although some nonnative introduced species have clearly caused ecological problems, there is no evidence this is true of Atlantic salmon. Secondly, critics of fish farms ignore the substantial negative consequences of many commercial fishing operations targeting wild fish. These include wasted, unintentionally caught bycatch (including threatened fish species) and destruction of the ocean floor ecosystem. Finally, there is no validity to the notion that North American farmed salmon are less healthy to eat than wild fish. PCB levels, for example, are correlated with high fat content of the fish. Farmed salmon frequently have lower levels than some of the highly prized and fatty wild salmon such as Copper River salmon. More importantly, no salmon studies have ever found dangerous levels of PCBs in any salmon, farmed or wild.

We all benefit from locally farmed fish, because without it, the cost of wild salmon would likely jump substantially and poaching of wild fish would increase to meet that demand. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife has conducted exhaustive studies of the potential impact of Atlantic salmon introductions in Washington. Their conclusion: “the evidence strongly indicates that Atlantic salmon aquaculture poses little risk to native salmon and non-salmon species.” Please, let’s all take a chill pill and relax over a tasty plate of Atlantic salmon knowing that food produced locally is good for the environment by reducing our carbon footprint and supporting rural communities.

David B. Powell

Redmond

Ph.D. Fisheries and certified fish pathologist

Vice president, ProFishent, Inc.

More in Letters to the Editor

Thank you Inslee | Letter

Thank you Inslee I am proud to have my Gov. Jay Inslee,… Continue reading

You need to run for office | Letter

In 2016, we all learned an interesting lesson, literally anyone who wants… Continue reading

Kudos to Kunkler | Letter

Kudos to Redmond Reporter’s Aaron Kunkler for two fascinating climate articles. “Human… Continue reading

Homelessness and the right to survive | Letter

Do homeless persons have a constitutional and civil right to occupy and… Continue reading

Ban FGM | Letter

Our state legislature just failed to ban the barbaric procedure known as… Continue reading

Equal-opportunity benefits needed | Letter

SB 5331 in the state legislature is called “long-term care services and… Continue reading

No urbanizing Samammish River Valley | Letter

DEMAND an environmental impact statement (EIS) for KCC ordinance 2018-0241 In the… Continue reading

Letters on LWSD levy | Letter

Whenever I’m asked for money, I have a few questions for the… Continue reading

Letters on EvergreenHealth levy | Letter

We’re writing to endorse EvergreenHealth’s proposed measure to increase levy funding that… Continue reading

Vote ‘yes’ on EvergreenHealth measure | Letter

This spring, voters on the Eastside will have the opportunity to approve… Continue reading

Vote NO on EvergreenHealth’s $345 million bond | Letter

Taxes are already too high. Including interest, the proposed $345 million bond… Continue reading

Moving forward | Letter

Change never comes easy and often times it arrives in the form… Continue reading