Redmond residents met with city officials at a March 29 community meeting to discuss the fate of 20 trees in Idylwood Beach Park. Aaron Kunkler/Staff Photo

Redmond residents met with city officials at a March 29 community meeting to discuss the fate of 20 trees in Idylwood Beach Park. Aaron Kunkler/Staff Photo

Fate of Idylwood trees to be determined by hearings examiner

Residents succeeded in temporarily halting the removal of the remaining 20 trees in the Redmond park.

The fate of around 20 trees slated for removal from Idylwood Beach Park in southeast Redmond was a hot topic at a recent community meeting with around 50 residents in attendance.

While the meeting wasn’t specifically about the removal of large cottonwood trees in the park, many residents took the opportunity to question council members and Mayor John Marchione on the decision to cut down a total of 30 trees. Around 10 smaller trees have already been taken down but the planned removal of three large trees in the northeast corner of the park on March 26 was postponed due to a challenge to the city’s grading and clearing permit.

Marchione said the dispute will go before a hearing examiner in coming weeks, who will decide the fate of the trees. Marchione said the city had obtained the needed grading and clearing permit, a shoreline permit and permission from the Department of Natural Resources and the U.S. Department of Fish and Wildlife. An environmental review known as a SEPA was additionally conducted.

Marchione said a grading and clearing permit is more robust than a tree removal permit and is required when more than 11 trees will be impacted.

“We exceeded the permit you would have needed on a house,” he said.

However, residents at the meeting said they were unhappy with a perceived lack of transparency, saying the city had not provided the actual permit evaluation documents when requested. They had hired an independent arborist to inspect the trees who they said wouldn’t proceed without receiving permission from the city.

Marchione said since the park is open to the public and the arborist has implicit permission to do an inspection on areas of the park the public has access to. Portions of the park around the trees have been blocked in recent weeks out of concern for public safety.

The tree removals stem from two incidents last summer when large branches fell into the park. In one case a branch smashed a picnic table. In the other, a woman was sent to the hospital in critical condition.

Marchione said the city’s risk department had identified the cottonwoods, which he said are weak wooded trees, as being a danger to public safety. Consequently, the city is obligated to remove them. This sentiment was echoed by council member Hank Margeson. The city would likely be sued if another branch harms park-goers.

“We are doing what we have to do as a city government to protect those that go to the park,” Margeson said. “It’s not something that we want to do.”

While the majority of the city council was at the meeting, the decision to cut the trees is an administrative decision made by the mayor’s office.

One woman in attendance said she welcomed the city’s removal of the trees. She lives next door to the park and said she warns patrons not to stand under the trees due to them being dangerous.

The largest cottonwoods are around 40 years old, Marchione said. Cottonwoods begin suffering from a phenomena known as sudden limb drop after 40 to 50 years and must be removed, Marchione said. The same large limbs that could pose a public health risk also provide a perch for a resident bald eagle that locals have named “Redmond.” Many at the meeting argued removing the trees could harm the eagle’s habitat.

City staff said there was one eagle’s nest in the park, but it was not in one of the cottonwoods slated for removal. Federal eagle protection acts prohibit the destruction or disturbance of eagle nests but says little about perches.

If the hearing examiner rules in favor of the city’s position, the remaining 20 trees will be removed and replaced with 60 trees.

More in News

Washington’s attorney general talks veterans, guns and suing Trump

Bob Ferguson visited the Redmond Rotary Club on Nov. 15.

King County Flood Control District approves 2019 Budget on Nov. 5. Photo courtesy of King County Flood Control District.
King County Flood Control District approves $93 million budget

The 2019 District Budget will maintain current flood protection services.

Vader served the Redmond Police Department for more than seven years and enjoyed a four-year retirement as the Hovenden family pet. Photos courtesy of RPD
Former Redmond police K-9 Vader, dies at 13

Vader served the department for more than 7 years and spent his retirement as a full-time family pet.

Sarah Yount, former YES client, speaks at YES’s 50th anniversary celebration on Nov. 2. Madison Miller/staff photo.
Youth Eastside Services celebrates 50 years

YES celebrates 50 years of providing youth and family behavioral health services.

Sky Metalwala has been missing for seven years. Photo courtesy of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
Police plead for help in search for missing boy

Sky has been missing since Nov. 6, 2011 and turned 9 years old on Sept. 2.

Suspect arrested after stealing paychecks | Police blotter

The Redmond police blotter from Oct. 22 through 24. Courtesy of the RPD blog.

Kuderer leads Tom; Walen over Bright

Legislative District 48 race. Results are preliminary.

Democrats lead in 45th Legislative District

Dhingra, Goodman and Springer earned about two thirds of the vote.

DelBene leads in 1st Congressional District in early returns

As of election night, incumbent Suzan DelBene was leading with 69 percent of the vote, to Jeffrey Beeler’s 31 percent.

King County property assessments have begun for some Eastside neighborhoods

County property appraisers visit around one-sixth of all properties in the county each year to ensure the homes are valued correctly.

Prowlers smash windows, steal wallets, handbags | Police blotter

The Redmond police blotter for Oct. 12 through 14.

Safeco Field funding referendum withdrawn

The mysterious backers of the initiative won’t say why, but some think it’s because they couldn’t get funding to gather the necessary signatures.