Meeting goals without a levy | Letter

At several meetings this month city staff has been saying they need more funding for fire than what is presently allocated. I get it. Our population is growing; and Fire Station 12, which serves the burgeoning Overlake urban center and Rose Hill, Grass Lawn and View Point neighborhoods needs remodeling and expansion. No doubt we’ll need a new fire station in Overlake some day, as well. Fire is drawing up a six-year master plan for these needs.

No doubt accommodating fire’s needs will require significant funding so the city is planning a new safety levy to pay for it. But, do we need a levy? No!

At council’s June 25 committee meeting, finance director Malisa Files reported the city is in excellent financial shape: “Department budgets [like fire] are running well and there’s really no issues in our funds.” She went onto say, “revenues are up by 17 percent, from sales tax and development revenue.”

Ms. Files has been reporting high revenue growth for well over a year with no end in sight. Even more impactful, Ms. Files reported, “we expect $20 million in property tax income over the next year.” If that’s not enough, the city has a Responsible Government priority from which it can tap $31,707,604 from their “operation reserves!”

Fiscal stewardship should be expected of a responsible government; allocations to fire and police should be priority No. 1. Our exceptional present and future revenues and “smart prioritizing” of other services should get us to our fire goals without the need for a safety levy. When the levy is one day proposed, please vote “no.”

Bob Yoder


In consideration of how we voice our opinions in the modern world, we’ve closed comments on our websites. We value the opinions of our readers and we encourage you to keep the conversation going.

Please feel free to share your story tips by emailing

To share your opinion for publication, submit a letter through our website Include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 300 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it.

More in Letters to the Editor

Defending Kuderer | Letter

This letter is regarding the Feb. 6, 2020, article “Chinese organizations file… Continue reading

Insensitive remark by Sen. Kuderer | Letter

Many were shocked to learn Sen. Patty Kuderer’s remark in a committee,… Continue reading

Better mental health care needed | Letter

Mayor Angela Birney’s vision statement was just released — “A connected community… Continue reading

Accept the vote and move on | Letter to the editor

This is in response to “Affirmative action measure fails but could resurface… Continue reading

The best Christmas gift | Letter to the editor

At about 11 a.m. on Dec. 20, I was involved in a… Continue reading

Perspective on cycling support on the Eastside | Letter

Perspective on cycling support on the Eastside Imagine for a minute the… Continue reading

Campaign funds for community | Letter

Thanks to all the Redmond voters that made this election energetic and… Continue reading

An appreciated public gesture | Letter

This is in response to “Art planned for Overlake Village to celebrate… Continue reading

Community weighs in on the election | Letter to the editor

Birney: a true community builder I first met Angela Birney in 2013,… Continue reading

Vote to re-elect Siri Bliesner | Letter

I am so grateful to have Siri Bliesner representing our children and… Continue reading

Birney walks the talk | Letter

Angela Birney is the best choice for Redmond mayor. I spent 11… Continue reading

Birney’s vision for community | Letter

Why do residents and community leaders across our region endorse Angela Birney… Continue reading