Residents’ input is always valued at city meetings | Letter

Recent letters to the editor about the process of local government leave me a bit confused. Does it move too slow, or does it not allow enough time for interested parties to participate? Are volunteers just in it for the self-esteem and accomplishing nothing, or are we leaving council with only yes/no votes?

I don’t volunteer my time on the Planning Commission for self-esteem. I spend time reading proposals, researching topics, asking questions, listening to testimony in public hearings and thinking about how to balance the needs and desires of everybody and what’s best for the city in any situation. We then make a recommendation to council, which is not a binary choice. Council can and has made significant changes to our work in the past, which is their prerogative as the elected body.

Some may feel the process is too sclerotic, and I agree it can feel that way. But the work that a government does seldom has easy answers; most often, there are stakeholders in conflict, and sometimes, even goals in conflict. If you want to give everybody an opportunity to make their case, and consider how to balance everything so as to mitigate the pain for the stakeholders who lose something and make sure the public gains benefits from the outcome, it takes time and a lot of minds looking at the issue from all sides. I don’t think the process is there just to slow down and obstruct, but to provide for the consideration of all perspectives. Given that council is spending taxpayer money, it seems prudent to take a thoughtful, considered approach, even if the process isn’t the most efficient.

I encourage people to attend a council meeting or a board or commission meeting. Your input is always valued.

Sherri Nichols

Redmond


In consideration of how we voice our opinions in the modern world, we’ve closed comments on our websites. We value the opinions of our readers and we encourage you to keep the conversation going.

Please feel free to share your story tips by emailing editor@redmond-reporter.com.

To share your opinion for publication, submit a letter through our website https://www.redmond-reporter.com/submit-letter/. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 300 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it.

More in Letters to the Editor

Defending Kuderer | Letter

This letter is regarding the Feb. 6, 2020, article “Chinese organizations file… Continue reading

Insensitive remark by Sen. Kuderer | Letter

Many were shocked to learn Sen. Patty Kuderer’s remark in a committee,… Continue reading

Better mental health care needed | Letter

Mayor Angela Birney’s vision statement was just released — “A connected community… Continue reading

Accept the vote and move on | Letter to the editor

This is in response to “Affirmative action measure fails but could resurface… Continue reading

The best Christmas gift | Letter to the editor

At about 11 a.m. on Dec. 20, I was involved in a… Continue reading

Perspective on cycling support on the Eastside | Letter

Perspective on cycling support on the Eastside Imagine for a minute the… Continue reading

Campaign funds for community | Letter

Thanks to all the Redmond voters that made this election energetic and… Continue reading

An appreciated public gesture | Letter

This is in response to “Art planned for Overlake Village to celebrate… Continue reading

Community weighs in on the election | Letter to the editor

Birney: a true community builder I first met Angela Birney in 2013,… Continue reading

Vote to re-elect Siri Bliesner | Letter

I am so grateful to have Siri Bliesner representing our children and… Continue reading

Birney walks the talk | Letter

Angela Birney is the best choice for Redmond mayor. I spent 11… Continue reading

Birney’s vision for community | Letter

Why do residents and community leaders across our region endorse Angela Birney… Continue reading