Response to the Low-Impact Development question | Letter

Letter to the editor. Courtesy graphic

The Low-Impact Development question and why proponents of this blanket approach are wrong

Last week Elizabeth Canning stated in the Redmond Reporter that the Redmond City Council “caved” to pressure from property developers in not adopting a one-size-fits-all approach regarding the state Department of Ecology (DoE) proposal to implement Low-Impact Development (LID) principles. Simply adopting the DoE’s LID principles ignores the fact that Redmond has been implementing LID principles and systems (like rooftop gardens and infiltrating rooftop water directly) in Overlake and downtown for years.

Canning writes that LID processes are “greener, smarter solutions” and that they are cost effective and widely available. What she fails to appreciate is that Redmond is far ahead of most cities in our proactive approach to protecting water quality, which regularly surpass DoE’s standards. The state regulation does provide flexibility to accommodate competing goals and we certainly need to know how those goals might be impacted before we make further changes.

Also, I wanted to address the idea that the council pulled back on this proposal. Others who were engaged in the process earlier would be aware that we were never considering an ordinance that would cover the whole city with DoE’s LID requirement. If those who testified the night of adoption had been part of the process and been present for the council briefings they would be aware that we were not backtracking on this proposal.

Council’s job is to make policy that is balanced and takes all needs into account. What council is doing here is being prudent by gathering all the facts before we make a final decision that has a lasting impact on our city.

David Carson

Redmond City Council, Pos. 7

In consideration of how we voice our opinions in the modern world, we’ve closed comments on our websites. We value the opinions of our readers and we encourage you to keep the conversation going.

Please feel free to share your story tips by emailing

To share your opinion for publication, submit a letter through our website Include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 300 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it.

More in Letters to the Editor

Defending Kuderer | Letter

This letter is regarding the Feb. 6, 2020, article “Chinese organizations file… Continue reading

Insensitive remark by Sen. Kuderer | Letter

Many were shocked to learn Sen. Patty Kuderer’s remark in a committee,… Continue reading

Better mental health care needed | Letter

Mayor Angela Birney’s vision statement was just released — “A connected community… Continue reading

Accept the vote and move on | Letter to the editor

This is in response to “Affirmative action measure fails but could resurface… Continue reading

The best Christmas gift | Letter to the editor

At about 11 a.m. on Dec. 20, I was involved in a… Continue reading

Perspective on cycling support on the Eastside | Letter

Perspective on cycling support on the Eastside Imagine for a minute the… Continue reading

Campaign funds for community | Letter

Thanks to all the Redmond voters that made this election energetic and… Continue reading

An appreciated public gesture | Letter

This is in response to “Art planned for Overlake Village to celebrate… Continue reading

Community weighs in on the election | Letter to the editor

Birney: a true community builder I first met Angela Birney in 2013,… Continue reading

Vote to re-elect Siri Bliesner | Letter

I am so grateful to have Siri Bliesner representing our children and… Continue reading

Birney walks the talk | Letter

Angela Birney is the best choice for Redmond mayor. I spent 11… Continue reading

Birney’s vision for community | Letter

Why do residents and community leaders across our region endorse Angela Birney… Continue reading