The preferred Smith Woods, Monticello Creek preferred design alternative. Photo courtesy of the city of Redmond

The preferred Smith Woods, Monticello Creek preferred design alternative. Photo courtesy of the city of Redmond

Redmond council agrees with preferred design alternative of Smith Woods Pond

The preferred design alternative maintains the pond, meets environmental permitting requirements and fits within current funding.

At a Nov. 12 Committee of the Whole meeting, the Redmond City Council was updated on the Smith Woods Pond and Stream Rehabilitation preferred design alternative.

The city purchased the Smith Woods property — 176th Avenue Northeast and Northeast 124th Street — in northeast Redmond in 2000 and then secured the entire property in 2011. The property includes the Monticello Creek, where the stream flows into a small pond on the property. The pond appears to have been built by the former owner.

Concerns with the stability of the berm surrounding the pond led the city to complete an emergency project in December 2015. The emergency project included cutting a temporary channel to reduce pond volume to eliminate the immediate risk of berm failure. The work was done under an emergency Hydraulic Permit Approval (HPA) from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. The city is required to rehabilitate the pond and stream to create a fish-passable channel by 2021.

The city contracted Osborn Consulting in March 2019 to assist staff in developing alternatives for the stream and pond that would improve fish passage and serve as an amenity for the future city park on the Smith Wood property as well. The consultant has collected data on the project site and produced information to develop alternatives, including wetland, hydrology, geotechnical and cultural resource reports.

The design team met with the Washington Fish Wildlife (WDFW) on site and consulted with the Muckleshoot tribe via email to assess alternatives. Staff from the public works and parks department reviewed the report and arrived at two alternative concept designs.

Emily Flanagan, senior surface water engineer, presented the council the two options: one that retains the pond and stream together and one that retains the stream only and converts the pond to wetlands.

After evaluation of different criteria, Flanagan said the staff and design consultant set on option one, which retains the pond and stream as preferred. Flanagan said the first option will restore the stream channel from the pond outlet down to Northeast 122nd Street to allow fish passage through the creek. Option one also maintains the pond, meets environmental permitting requirements and fits within current funding.

City staff brought the project to council in February and March of 2019 and there was a strong interest in maintaining the pond feature. The council was provided with updated information since 2015. The projects and trails commission also had several updates since 2017.

Flanagan said they would move forward with 30 percent of the design, unless the councilmembers had concerns.

Councilmember Hank Margeson asked about the detailed cost estimate of the design and if the council would receive those details before the final design documents in 2021.

Rob Crittenden, project manager, said they will most likely have the 30 percent design completed by February or March of next year and possibly have the cost estimate by then. Crittenden said there will be a need for a supplemental agreement with the consultant to move forward with final design first, and that would be the opportunity to update the council.

Councilmember David Carson mentioned it was a good idea to keep the pond but asked if there were future concerns.

Flanagan said geo-techs will be helping with the design and water level will be lower than the original pond.

“With the current design, there’s not a lot of long-term maintenance or concerns about keeping it safe,” she said.

Crittenden added that they are also looking into additional reinforcements of the berm.

Councilmember Tanika Padhye asked if the department had performed outreach in the Monticello neighborhood.

Flanagan said they did not reached out to Monticello residents, as their impression was that preserving the pond was a popular portion of the park.

A detailed estimate will be prepared following completion of the 30 percent plans. WDFW permits require the project to be completed by 2021.

The project budget is $1,113,000 ($735,000 stormwater, $378,000 parks). The project has been in both Stormwater and Parks six-years capital improvement projects (CIP) since 2017. It was approved in the 2019-20 budget.

For more information about Smith Woods Pond, go to www.redmond.gov.


In consideration of how we voice our opinions in the modern world, we’ve closed comments on our websites. We value the opinions of our readers and we encourage you to keep the conversation going.

Please feel free to share your story tips by emailing editor@redmond-reporter.com.

To share your opinion for publication, submit a letter through our website https://www.redmond-reporter.com/submit-letter/. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 300 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it.

Image courtesy of the city of Redmond 
                                Smith Woods, Conceptual Plan.

Image courtesy of the city of Redmond Smith Woods, Conceptual Plan.

More in News

How is COVID-19 affecting Redmond?

Latest numbers on cases and deaths.

Kabal Gill, owner of East India Grill in Federal Way, wears gloves to hand over take-out orders at his restaurant on March 23. File photo
New guidelines for Phase 2 reopenings in King County

All workers will need to wear masks as restaurants, retail shops and other businesses reopen.

This undated file photo provided by U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows CDC’s laboratory test kit for the new coronavirus. Courtesy photo
Inslee wants nursing home residents and staff tested by June 12

Governor says state will pay for test kits and personal protective equipment.

Stock image
Campgrounds to reopen in 22 Washington counties

Campgrounds in counties actively in Phase 2 of the reopening plan will begin to welcome visitors June 1, state says.

King County Sheriff Mitzi Johanknecht. FILE PHOTO
King County sheriff releases message about Minneapolis Police officer

Mitzi Johanknecht calls video of officer kneeling on neck of George Floyd ‘heartbreaking and disturbing’

File photo of construction near North Bend on Aug. 16. Sound Publishing file photo
                                File photo of construction near North Bend on Aug. 16. Sound Publishing file photo
Rural King County mayors want state to let them enter Phase 2

Mayors cite heavy economic damage from prolonged shutdown.

New dashboard shows how far along King County is to meeting Phase II metrics

The county has met more than half its goals, but the ones it hasn’t met are critical in determining how many people are still being infected, and how quickly people are being tested.

As sales tax plummets in King County, mental health and drug program funding dries up

County will need to make severe cuts to MIDD program this year.

Auburn Mountain View Cemetery Manager Craig Hudson, center, confers with maintenance workers David Partridge, left, and Zach Hopper in March 2020. Sound Publishing file photo
State allows weddings, funerals, religious services to restart with restrictions

Gov. Inslee issues new rules during May 27 news conference.

Most Read