Residents’ input is always valued at city meetings | Letter

Recent letters to the editor about the process of local government leave me a bit confused. Does it move too slow, or does it not allow enough time for interested parties to participate? Are volunteers just in it for the self-esteem and accomplishing nothing, or are we leaving council with only yes/no votes?

I don’t volunteer my time on the Planning Commission for self-esteem. I spend time reading proposals, researching topics, asking questions, listening to testimony in public hearings and thinking about how to balance the needs and desires of everybody and what’s best for the city in any situation. We then make a recommendation to council, which is not a binary choice. Council can and has made significant changes to our work in the past, which is their prerogative as the elected body.

Some may feel the process is too sclerotic, and I agree it can feel that way. But the work that a government does seldom has easy answers; most often, there are stakeholders in conflict, and sometimes, even goals in conflict. If you want to give everybody an opportunity to make their case, and consider how to balance everything so as to mitigate the pain for the stakeholders who lose something and make sure the public gains benefits from the outcome, it takes time and a lot of minds looking at the issue from all sides. I don’t think the process is there just to slow down and obstruct, but to provide for the consideration of all perspectives. Given that council is spending taxpayer money, it seems prudent to take a thoughtful, considered approach, even if the process isn’t the most efficient.

I encourage people to attend a council meeting or a board or commission meeting. Your input is always valued.

Sherri Nichols

Redmond

More in Letters to the Editor

Encouraging innovation | Letter

Earlier this year, I had a kidney transplant and it changed my… Continue reading

Alzheimer’s is a public health crisis | Letter

There are more than 110,000 residents of our state living with Alzheimer’s… Continue reading

The damage of fracking | Letter

The final environmental impact statement for the world’s largest fracked gas and… Continue reading

Simply outrageous | Letter

The Reporter’s article, “Lights for Liberty Vigil protests the inhumane conditions faced… Continue reading

Irony behind administration’s immigration policies | Letter

Thousands of asylum seekers from El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras — some… Continue reading

A moon landing, an American dream | Letter

We recently celebrated the anniversary of one of the biggest engineering feats… Continue reading

Government should consider existing residents | Letter

Satisfied with Redmond, vote for incumbents: David Carson, Hank Meyers. Angela Birney… Continue reading

Vote ‘yes’ to Prop. 1 | Letter

Please vote to approve the revised Prop. 1 for EvergreenHealth to provide… Continue reading

Fields has experience, vision and commitment | Letter

Everywhere I go, someone complains to me, as former 16 year mayor… Continue reading

Fields to guide Redmond | Letter

Steve Fields’ leadership style sets him apart. In Redmond’s “Strong Mayor” form… Continue reading

Birney for an inclusive, collaborative city | Letter

Angela Birney is the candidate for mayor with the broadest sense of… Continue reading

Koeppen a clear choice for Redmond | Letter

Andrew Koeppen is the clear choice for mayor of Redmond. As an… Continue reading